In this calculus series, we will assume that the functions and
have been well-defined. These allow for definitions of common trigonometric functions like
.
We want to differentiate their inverses and
. Here is the definition of the inverse of a function.
Definition. A function defined on
has an inverse if for any
,
.
However, a technical discussion on the properties of and
will take us beyond the focus of differentiation. For this discussion, we will make the following assumptions:
restricted to
has an inverse
.
has an inverse
.
is differentiable on
and
.
is differentiable on
and
.
We will rigorously define these functions more carefully, and prove these properties, when studying the big brother of calculus that grounds it, known as real analysis.
Before we can prove the inverse function theorem, which allows us to differentiate inverses, we first need some technical tools. The first is the famous intermediate value theorem, which can only be fully proven using real-analytic tools, and thus is omitted from this discussion.
Theorem 1 (Intermediate Value Theorem). Let be continuous. Suppose
without loss of generality. Then for any
, there exists
such that
.
With some effort, we can derive the general case by first proving the special case ,
, and
. We will relegate that in a discussion on real analysis.
Using the intermediate value theorem, we will first show that any interval remains an interval.
Lemma 1. Let be continuous on
. For any
, define
. Then for any
with
, if
, then
.
Proof. Fix with
. Find inputs
such that
. Suppose
without loss of generality.
Fix . Since
is continuous on
, by the intermediate value theorem, there exists
such that
.
We will next show that the inverse of any continuous function must be continuous.
Lemma 2. Let be a real-valued function that is continuous on
. Suppose
has an inverse
. Then
is continuous on the interval
.
Proof. Fix . By the intermediate value theorem, find
such that
. Since
is continuous at
,
Finally, here is the inverse function theorem in one dimension.
Theorem 2 (Inverse Function Theorem). Let be differentiable on
. Suppose
has an inverse
on
. Then for any
such that
,
is differentiable at
and
The theorem for higher-dimensions takes a lot more effort to define and prove. For this post, we will omit that.
Proof. The key component of this proof is Carathéodory’s theorem, which we have proven previously.
Let and
. Then
By Carathéodory’s theorem, find a continuous function such that
with .
Substituting,
By Caratheodory’s theorem, define the continuous function , which satisfies
, to complete the result.
As a consequence, we obtain the differentiability of on
and
on
. To obtain their derivatives
and
, either apply the inverse function theorem, or simply use the chain rule.
To illustrate this technique, let’s prove that .
Theorem 3. .
Proof. By the inverse function theorem,
The derivative of helps us obtain one of the most lovely results in differentiation.
Theorem 3. Let be a nonzero real number. Then for positive
,
.
Proof. Writing and applying the chain rule,
—Joel Kindiak, 21 Oct 24, 1126H
Leave a comment