Students in integral calculus are often penalised for omitting the arbitrary constant of integration, namely,
Here, the answer on the left would be penalised for incompleteness. But why?
There are several layers of explanations for this, but all of them are re-packagings of the following result:
Constancy Lemma. Let be continuous and differentiable on
. Suppose
. Then for any
,
.
Proof. Fix . By the mean value theorem, find
such that
In other words, a differentiable function with identically zero gradient is necessarily constant.
Therefore, for any constant , it is no surprise that differentiating that yields
. By the fundamental theorem of calculus, integrating
should yield any constant. We don’t even know what this constant is!
We can formalise this finding using this result, known as the second part of the fundamental theorem of calculus.
Fundamental Theorem of Calculus II (FTC II). Let be continuously differentiable (i.e.
is differentiable on
and
be continuous on
). Then for any
and any choice of
,
Denoting ,
Proof. Define by
By the first fundamental theorem of calculus, is differentiable and
By the constancy lemma,
By algebra,
The existence of the is the reason for the
. The quantity
could have been any number, and the derivative of
would still be
. In fact, once
is specified, we necessarily obtain a unique
. This plays a crucial role in studying differential equations. This is also why we use the notation
where can be computed quickly, and the
allows us to abbreviate the infinitely many possible choices for
.
For all intents and purposes, we write to mean any function where we know what
is. Usually, we choose a convenient expression for
. We will complete a quick calculation to illustrate this calculation point.
Theorem. We have for nonnegative integers ,
Proof. Define . By the power rule
By FTC II,
Substituting,
The final observation that
justifies the popular heuristic of integration as “reverse differentiation”, plus .
—Joel Kindiak, 23 Oct 24, 0908H
Leave a comment