A Fascinating Multiples Problem

Problem 1. Let I \subseteq \mathbb Z be a subset with the following properties:

  • I \backslash \{0\} \neq \emptyset.
  • For any x,y \in I, x+y \in I.
  • For any x \in I and \alpha \in \mathbb Z, \alpha x \in I.

Prove that there exists n_0 \in \mathbb Z such that I = \{kn_0 : k \in \mathbb Z\} \equiv n_0 \mathbb Z.

(Click for Solution)

Solution. By the first property, there exists some nonzero n \in I. By the third property, -n = (-1)n \in I. Thus, without loss of generality, suppose n > 0.

By the well-ordering principle, there exists some unique n_0 > 0 such that

\displaystyle n_0 = \min \{m \in I : m > 0\}.

Now we prove that I = n_0 \mathbb Z.

For (\supseteq), fix u \in n_0 \mathbb Z. Then there exists k \in \mathbb Z such that u = k n_0 \in I.

For (\subseteq), fix v \in I. By the division algorithm, find integers q, r with 0 \leq r < n_0 such that v = qn_0 + r.

We claim that r = 0 by way of contradiction. Suppose otherwise that 1 \leq r < n_0. Then by the third and second properties respectively, r = v + (-q)n_0 \in I.

However, by the definition of n_0, we have n_0 \leq r < n_0, a contradiction.

Therefore, r = 0, which yields v = qn_0 \in n_0 \mathbb Z.

—Joel Kindiak, 31 Oct 24, 0105H


Leave a comment