A fuller discussion on infinity can be contemplated in set theory. Here, we’ll discuss the zeroth-order infinity: the cardinal number , which we defined to be
. In fact, we will gradually analyse the cardinality of the famous sets
.
Definition 1. Let be a set. Write
if
(in these posts, the notation
refers to the existence of a bijection
). In words, we say that
is countably infinite.
Example 1. The set is countably infinite.
Proof. Define the bijection by
.
In fact, more is true.
Theorem 1. Let be any set, and
be injective. Then
is countably infinite.
Proof. Define the bijection by
.
We have seen previously that any countable set , if not finite, must satisfy
. Sometimes, it is easier to use several intermediate results to establish countability. To take full advantage of these results, we need some auxiliary tools.
Lemma 1. Fix finite sets . Suppose there exists an injection
. Then
.
Proof. Writing and
, it suffices to prove the case
and
. Similar to before, we will prove this result by induction on
.
Base case: Suppose . Then
. Let
denote an injection, which must be the empty function
,
. In particular,
, and following previous arguments,
, as required.
Induction step: Fix . Suppose
is injective. We need to show that
. If
then we are done. Assume instead that
.
Define the sets and
. Then
via the bijection
defined by
Furthermore, the map defined by
is injective. By the induction hypothesis, we have , which simplifies to
, as required.
Next, we will establish two preservation results.
Lemma 2. Let be sets and
be an injection.
- If
is finite, so is
.
- If
is countable, so is
.
Proof. Since , we will assume
without loss of generality via the injective inclusion map
defined by
. The second claim is immediate from established definitions. For the first claim,
for some
.
Suppose for a contradiction that is not finite. Then
. Let
denote a possible bijection. This means that the composite map
is injective. In particular, the restriction
is injective. This implies
, a blatant contradiction.
This characterisation of countability in terms of injections is an incredibly useful abbreviation whenever we need to evaluate a set’s cardinality.
Lemma 3. Let be any set. Then
is countable (resp. finite) if and only if there exists a countable set
(resp. finite) and an injection
.
Proof. The proof of is the content of Lemma 2. For
, let’s first suppose
is countable. Then there exists a (countable) set
such that
. Let
denote the bijection. Then
defined by
is injective, as required. If
is finite, replace
with
for sufficiently large
.
Lemma 4. is countably infinite.
Proof. Define the injective map by
. Since
, we can conclude
is countable. Since
contains
, it is not finite. Thus,
, which implies
.
In fact, more is true.
Theorem 2. Let ,
be countable. Then
is countable.
Proof. By the proof of Lemma 3, find injections and
. Then the map
defined by
is injective. By Lemma 3 again,
is countable.
Finally, we can evaluate the cardinality of .
Theorem 3. is countably infinite.
Proof. Define the injection by
In the next post, we will revisit the cardinality of through a different perspective, and use that to establish the cardinality of
.
—Joel Kindiak, 6 Nov 24, 1232H
Leave a comment