Defining the Real Exponential

What does a^x mean? If a = 0, then 0^x = 0 no matter what x we choose (except perhaps x = 0, but that’s a debate for another day). Suppose a > 0. We want the exponential function to satisfies these two properties.

Definition 1. Let a > 0 be a real number and K be a set. Define the predicates \phi,\psi on K^2 by

\begin{aligned} \phi(m,n) &:= (a^{m+n} = a^ma^n), \\ \psi(m,n) &:= ((a^m)^n = a^{mn}).\end{aligned}

With some effort, we can define a^x reasonably for rational x. We can even use these properties to prove most of the laws of exponents.

The real challenge begins now: what is a^x for real x? For instance, what does {10}^\pi mean? It is not at all obvious how we can formulate this notion rigorously.

We have defined a^0 := 1, and for any x > 0, the definition of a^x yields the definition a^{-x} := 1/{a^x} > 0.

Lemma 1. For rational numbers r < s,

  • a^r < a^s if a> 1 and
  • a^r > a^s if 0 < a < 1.

Proof. Suppose a > 1. We first prove the special case r = 0.

Thus, it suffices to prove the case r = 0. Write s = m/n for positive integers m,n. Then a^{m/n} = \sqrt[n]{a^m}, so that a^m > 1^m = 1 implies that

a^s = a^{m/n} = \sqrt[n]{a^m} > \sqrt[n]{1} = 1

by definition of the n-th root. For the general case, if r < s, then

\displaystyle \frac{a^s}{a^r} = a^{s-r} > 1 \quad \Rightarrow \quad a^r < a^s.

If 0 < a < 1, then a^{-1} = 1/a > 1. By the first result,

a^{-r} = (a^{-1})^r < (a^{-1})^s = a^{-s}.

Taking reciprocals, a^r = 1/{a^{-r}} > 1/{a^{-s}} = a^s.

Lemma 2. Fix x > 0. Then there exists an increasing sequence \{x_n\} of rational numbers such that x_n \to x.

Proof. By the density theorem, find a rational number x_1 \in (x/2,x).

Inductively, find a rational number x_{n+1} \in (\max\{x_n, x-1/n\}, x). Then

x_n \leq \max\{x_n , x-1/n\} < x_{n+1}< x

and

\displaystyle x-\frac 1n \leq \max\left\{x_n, x-\frac 1n\right\} < x_{n+1} < x \quad \Rightarrow \quad |x_{n+1} - x| < \frac 1n \to 0.

By the squeeze theorem, |x_{n+1} - x| \to 0 \iff x_{n+1} \to x.

Returning to a motivating question: what does {10}^\pi mean? Intuitively, it is the limit of the sequence

(10^3, 10^{3.1}, 10^{3.14},\dots) \approx (1000, 1259, 1380, \dots).

Each term is well-defined, since it is of the form a^x, where x is rational. This example then suitably motivates our main discussion.

Theorem 1. Fix x > 0. Then the limit

\displaystyle a^x := \lim_{n \to \infty} a^{x_n}

exists, where \{x_n\} any increasing sequence of rational numbers such that x_n \to x. In partiular, 10^{\pi} \approx 1385.456.

Proof. By Lemma 2, such a sequence \{x_n\} exists.

Suppose a > 1. By Lemma 1, \{a^{x_n}\} is increasing and even bounded above, since we can find a rational number x_0 \in (x,x+1) so that a^{x_n} \leq a^{x_0}. By the monotone convergence theorem, a^{x_n} \to L > 1 exists.

Suppose \{y_n\} is any increasing sequence with y_n \to x, and a^{y_n} \to M > 1. We need to prove that L = M. Since

y_n < x \quad \iff \quad x - y_n > 0,

there exists n_k \in \mathbb N^+ such that

0 < x-x_{n_k} < 1/n_k < x-y_n \quad \Rightarrow \quad y_n < x_{n_k}.

Taking n \to \infty yields n_k \to \infty, so that L \leq M. A symmetric argument yields M \leq L, as required.

For 0 < a < 1, since 1/a > 0, the previous argument together with limit laws yields

\displaystyle \frac 1{a^x} = \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac 1{a^{x_n}} \quad \Rightarrow \quad a^x = \lim_{n \to \infty} a^{x_n}.

With any definition, we need to check that our basic rules apply.

Theorem 2. \phi \wedge \psi on \mathbb R^2.

Proof. It suffices to prove \phi \wedge \psi on \mathbb R_+^2, since the final result follows from defining a^{-x} := 1/{a^x}.

For \phi(x, y), we consider increasing rational sequences x_n \to x, y_n \to y. Then x_n + y_n \to x + y is increasing too, and

\displaystyle a^{x+y} = \lim_{n \to \infty} a^{x_n+y_n} = \lim_{n \to \infty} (a^{x_n} a^{y_n}) = \lim_{n \to \infty} a^{x_n} \cdot \lim_{n \to \infty} a^{y_n} = a^x a^y.

For \psi(x, y), we will first prove the result for real x and rational y. Consider any increasing rational sequence x_n \to x. Then x_n y \to xy is an increasing rational sequence, and by the (sequential) continuity of taking rational exponents (i.e. the map x \mapsto x^y),

\displaystyle \begin{aligned}\displaystyle (a^x)^y &= \left(\lim_{n \to \infty} a^{x_n}\right)^y =\lim_{n \to \infty} (a^{x_n})^y = \lim_{n \to \infty} a^{x_n y} = a^{xy}. \end{aligned}

For the general result, consider any increasing rational sequence y_n \to y. Then

\displaystyle \begin{aligned}\displaystyle (a^x)^y &= \lim_{n \to \infty} (a^x)^{y_n} = \lim_{n \to \infty} a^{xy_n}. \end{aligned}

To complete the proof, find an increasing rational sequence x_m \to x. In particular,

a^{x_n y_n} \leq a^{xy_n} \leq a^{xy}.

Since x_ny_n \to xy, the left-hand side simplifies to a^{x_ny_n} \to a^{xy}. By the squeeze theorem, a^{xy_n} \to a^{xy} so that (a^x)^y = a^{xy}, as required.

Once we have \phi \wedge \psi on \mathbb R^2, we obtain all the laws of exponents, and consequently, the laws of logarithms. However, the latter assumes that a^x is bijective as a function of x. We prove this final result here, with a technical lemma en route whose proof is isomorphic to that of Theorem 1.

Lemma 3. Fix a > 0 and x > 0. Then the limit

\displaystyle a^x := \lim_{n \to \infty} a^{x_n}

exists, where \{x_n\} any decreasing sequence of rational numbers such that x_n \to x.

Proof. By hypothesis, \{-x_n\} is an increasing sequence of rational numbers such that -x_n \to -x. Using the definition a^{-x} = 1/a^x, we have

\displaystyle \frac 1{a^x} = a^{-x} = \lim_{n \to \infty} a^{-x_n} = \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac 1{a^{x_n}}.

Using limit laws, a^{x_n} \to a^x, as required.

Theorem 3. The function f : \mathbb R \to \mathbb R^+ defined by f(x) = a^x is bijective.

Proof. We can show that f is injective by showing that r<s implies f(r)<f(s):

\displaystyle \frac{ f(s) }{ f(r) } = \frac{ a^s }{ a^r } = a^{s-r}.

Since s > r implies a^{s-r} > 1 by Lemma 1, we have f(r) < f(s), as required.

To show that f is surjective, we will first need the continuity of f. Let x_n \to x be any real-valued sequence. Find a rational sequence r_n such that |x_n - r_n| < 1/n. This will imply that r_n \to x as well.

Define r_n^{\pm} such that r_n^- \leq x_n \leq r_n^+, where \{r_n^-\} is increasing and \{r_n^+\} is decreasing. By definition, a^{r_n^-} \to a^x. By Lemma 3, a^{r_n^+} \to a^x. The squeeze theorem yields

f(x_n) = a^{x_n} \to a^x = f(x),

establishing continuity.

Now we aim to show that f is surjective, that is: for any y > 0, there exists x \in \mathbb R such that f(x) = y.

For y = 1, choose x = 0 to obtain f(0) = a^0 = 1, as required. Suppose y \neq 1.

Fix y > 1. Find n \in \mathbb N such that a^n > y. Then

a^{-n} = 1/{a^n} < 1/y < y.

Since f can be shown to be continuous on [-n,n], by the intermediate value theorem, there exists x \in (-n, n) such that a^x = y. For y < 1, apply the previous result to 1/y > 1, then use the laws of exponents.

Therefore, a^x is a bijective function, which yields an inverse function, denoted \log_a(x), known as the logarithm base-a.

—Joel Kindiak, 15 Dec 24, 0146H

,

Published by


Leave a comment