What does mean? If
, then
no matter what
we choose (except perhaps
, but that’s a debate for another day). Suppose
. We want the exponential function to satisfies these two properties.
Definition 1. Let be a real number and
be a set. Define the predicates
on
by
With some effort, we can define reasonably for rational
. We can even use these properties to prove most of the laws of exponents.
The real challenge begins now: what is for real
? For instance, what does
mean? It is not at all obvious how we can formulate this notion rigorously.
We have defined , and for any
, the definition of
yields the definition
.
Lemma 1. For rational numbers ,
if
and
if
.
Proof. Suppose . We first prove the special case
.
Thus, it suffices to prove the case . Write
for positive integers
. Then
, so that
implies that
by definition of the -th root. For the general case, if
, then
If , then
. By the first result,
Taking reciprocals, .
Lemma 2. Fix . Then there exists an increasing sequence
of rational numbers such that
.
Proof. By the density theorem, find a rational number .
Inductively, find a rational number . Then
and
By the squeeze theorem, .
Returning to a motivating question: what does mean? Intuitively, it is the limit of the sequence
Each term is well-defined, since it is of the form , where
is rational. This example then suitably motivates our main discussion.
Theorem 1. Fix . Then the limit
exists, where any increasing sequence of rational numbers such that
. In partiular,
.
Proof. By Lemma 2, such a sequence exists.
Suppose . By Lemma 1,
is increasing and even bounded above, since we can find a rational number
so that
. By the monotone convergence theorem,
exists.
Suppose is any increasing sequence with
, and
. We need to prove that
. Since
there exists such that
Taking yields
, so that
. A symmetric argument yields
, as required.
For , since
, the previous argument together with limit laws yields
With any definition, we need to check that our basic rules apply.
Theorem 2. on
.
Proof. It suffices to prove on
, since the final result follows from defining
.
For , we consider increasing rational sequences
,
. Then
is increasing too, and
For , we will first prove the result for real
and rational
. Consider any increasing rational sequence
. Then
is an increasing rational sequence, and by the (sequential) continuity of taking rational exponents (i.e. the map
),
For the general result, consider any increasing rational sequence . Then
To complete the proof, find an increasing rational sequence . In particular,
Since , the left-hand side simplifies to
. By the squeeze theorem,
so that
, as required.
Once we have on
, we obtain all the laws of exponents, and consequently, the laws of logarithms. However, the latter assumes that
is bijective as a function of
. We prove this final result here, with a technical lemma en route whose proof is isomorphic to that of Theorem 1.
Lemma 3. Fix and
. Then the limit
exists, where any decreasing sequence of rational numbers such that
.
Proof. By hypothesis, is an increasing sequence of rational numbers such that
. Using the definition
, we have
Using limit laws, , as required.
Theorem 3. The function defined by
is bijective.
Proof. We can show that is injective by showing that
implies
:
Since implies
by Lemma 1, we have
, as required.
To show that is surjective, we will first need the continuity of
. Let
be any real-valued sequence. Find a rational sequence
such that
. This will imply that
as well.
Define such that
, where
is increasing and
is decreasing. By definition,
. By Lemma 3,
. The squeeze theorem yields
establishing continuity.
Now we aim to show that is surjective, that is: for any
, there exists
such that
.
For , choose
to obtain
, as required. Suppose
.
Fix . Find
such that
. Then
Since can be shown to be continuous on
, by the intermediate value theorem, there exists
such that
. For
, apply the previous result to
, then use the laws of exponents.
Therefore, is a bijective function, which yields an inverse function, denoted
, known as the logarithm base-
.
—Joel Kindiak, 15 Dec 24, 0146H
Leave a comment