Let’s properly discuss classical trigonometry. For a novel approach using rational trigonometry, see this post. Assume that the notion of an angle is well-defined.
Definition 1. Consider the following right-angled triangle with acute angle . Here and subsequently, we adopt the radian notation for angles that stipulates
.

We abbreviate the words opposite, adjacent, and hypotenuse. We define the sine, cosine, and tangent of as follows:
Example 1. By considering the –
–
and
–
–
right triangles, we have the following trigonometric ratios for special angles:
The case will play a crucial role for us later. Denote
for brevity. We will not care too much about the tangent function, since it is connected to sine and cosine in the following way:
Theorem 1. Let . Then
Proof. For the first identity, use Pythagoras’ theorem to obtain
For the second identity, we observe that
For the last identity, since the complementary angle is ,
Strictly speaking, the cosine function is effectively a mutation of the sine function, and so we could technically do all of trigonometry in terms of sine. However, cosine does have its uses and will play a crucial role in our discussions moving forward.
There are many trigonometric identities built off the first two identities, and we will leave them as exercises in algebraic manipulation. For a serious study of trigonometry, we have to ask the all-important question: what is if
is not acute? In particular, what is a sensible definition for
? The answer to the latter question turns out to answer the former question.
Theorem 2. Let be acute angles. If
is acute, then
Proof. Consider the following diagram for the proof of both identities.

The first identity corresponds to finding an alternate expression for , and the second identity corresponds to finding an alternate expression for
. The ratios of interest are
By considering the area of the whole triangle using the bases and
respectively,
Dividing by on both sides,
By basic trigonometric ratios,
For the second identity, by the Pythagorean theorem,
By algebruh,
Therefore,
Simplifying the equation,
By Pythagoras’ theorem, , so that
Dividing by on both sides,
By basic trigonometric ratios,
Corollary 1. Let be acute. If
is acute, then
Proof. Set in Theorem 2.
The key insight is the following: as long as the right-hand side is well-defined, so is the left-hand side. This is our strategy to define and
on all of
. Let’s systematise our plan.
Definition 1. For any subset , let
be the proposition that for any
,
and
are well-defined, and
Write to abbreviate the proposition “
is true”. Our overarching goal is to provide sensible definitions for
and
such that
. By Theorem 1, we have established
and Corollary 1 will help us “double” our results to achieve the massive sub-goal of
.
Theorem 3. For any , suppose
and
are well-defined on
. For any
, denote
and define
If , then
.
Proof. Fix . Then
. Observe that
so that and
Since , expanding the right-hand side yields
On the other hand,
With careful algebraic expansion, we will obtain
Similarly, we will obtain
Corollary 2. . In particular, we have the following special angles:
Proof. Fix . Then there exists
such that
. Using induction, we can prove that
. Therefore,
are well-defined on
and the identities
hold for any . Hence,
, as required.
Corollary 3. For any ,
Furthermore, for any positive integer ,
We have done a remarkable task: defining on
and proving that they satisfy the desired addition formulae. But we haven’t proven this case for all of
, since
. Surprisingly, though, Corollary 3 gives us a unique insight. Observe that for
,
and
are well-defined expressions. This means we can do a “reverse” definition for non-positive
.
Theorem 4. For any , let
denote any integer such that
. The notions
are well-defined by Corollary 3. Then . In particular,
Proof. Fix . Find
such that
and
. Then
so that
allows
A similar calculation yields
Thus, we have properly defined and
on all of
, and even proved that the identities
are well-defined and hold for any . From these two key identities, we obtain all other trigonometric identities commonly obtained in tables of mathematical formulas.
—Joel Kindiak, 4 Jun 25, 1758H
Leave a comment