Tietze Extension Theorem

Let K be a normal Hausdorff space and C \subseteq K be closed. Assume that the Urysohn lemma is a valid means to construct useful continuous maps.

Problem 1. For any r > 0 and any continuous map f : C \to [-r, r], construct a continuous map g : K \to [-r/3, r/3] such that (g-f)(C) \in [0, 2r/3].

(Click for Solution)

Solution. Let f : C \to [-r, r] be a continuous map. We observe that K \backslash C is open. We will first construct a function g that approximates f reasonably well.

Decompose [-r, r] = [-r,-r/3] \cup [-r/3,r/3] \cup [r/3, r] and define the closed subspaces

C_1 := f^{-1}([-r,-r/3]), \quad C_2 := f^{-1}([-r/3,r/3]), \quad C_3 := f^{-1}([r/3,r])

of K. Since C_1 \cap C_3 = \emptyset and K is normal, the Urysohn lemma gives us a continuous function g : K \to [-r/3,r/3] such that g(C_1) = \{-r/3\} and g(C_3) = \{r/3\}.

We observe the following estimates: by construction, |g(x)| \leq r/3 for any x \in K. By considering cases, |g(x) - f(x)| \leq 2r/3 for any x \in K.

Problem 2. For any continuous map f : C \to [-1, 1], construct one extension F : K \to [-1, 1] of f such that F is continuous and F|_C = f.

(Click for Solution)

Solution. Let f : C \to [-1, 1] be any continuous map. Use Problem 1 to construct g_1 : K \to [-1/3,1/3] such that

|(f-g_1)(x)| \leq 2/3,\quad x \in C.

Replacing f with f-g_1, use Problem 1 again to construct g_2 : K \to [-1/3^2, 1/3^2] such that

|(f - (g_1 + g_2))(x)| \leq (2/3)^2,\quad x \in C.

Repeating the process, we obtain a sequence \{g_n\} of continuous maps such that g_n : K \to [-1/3^n, 1/3^n] and

|(f - (g_1 + g_2 + \dots + g_n))(x)| \leq (2/3)^n,\quad x \in C.

Then f_n := g_1 + \cdots + g_n should converge to some limit function F, and by our estimates, since d_\infty( f_n,  f) \leq (2/3)^n when restricted to C, we have f_n \to f uniformly on C too. Therefore, F|_C = f, as required.

Problem 3. For any continuous map f : C \to \mathbb R, construct one extension F : K \to \mathbb R of f such that F is continuous and F|_C = f.

(Click for Solution)

Solution. Since (-1, 1) \cong \mathbb R via the homeomorphism t \mapsto t/(1-t^2), it suffices to prove the result for f : C \to (-1, 1). By Problem 2, extend f : C \to (-1, 1) \subseteq [-1, 1] to a continuous map g : K \to [-1, 1].

Define the closed set D := g^{-1}(\{-1, 1\}). Since g extends f, g(C) \subseteq (-1, 1) Hence, C \cap D = \emptyset. Use Urysohn’s lemma to supply a continuous map \phi : K \to [0, 1] where \phi(D) = \{0\} and \phi(C) = \{1\}.

Now verify that the definition F =\phi \cdot g : K \to (-1, 1) is the desired extension, i.e. \pm 1 \notin F(K) and F|_C = f.

—Joel Kindiak, 17 May 25, 1538H

,

Published by


Leave a comment