For any , there exist unique real numbers
such that
. Recall that
forms a normed space under the usual Euclidean norm
Therefore, we can discuss limits and continuity without worry in the sense of –
limits:
if and only if for any
, there exists
such that
Differentiation, however, requires more special features of , and it turns out to have even more special features than even
.
Definition 1. A function is said to be complex-differentiable at
if there exists a (unique) complex number
such that
We say that is complex-differentiable on
if
is complex-differentiable at every
.
Example 0. For any fixed , the constant function
is complex-differentiable on
with
: for any
,
Example 1. The function (i.e.
) is complex-differentiable on
, and
: for any
,
Theorem 1. Let be complex-differentiable at
.
is complex-differentiable at
,
- for any
,
is complex-differentiable at
,
are complex-differentiable at
,
- if
, then
and
are complex-differentiable at
.
Proof. Same computations as in the case of real analysis, assuming that the map defined by
is continuous, which we prove below in the special case
to reiterate:
Fix . By algebra,
Therefore, we set so that
:
Plugging in to our original estimate,
Therefore, further stipulate that (so that consolidating we set
) and we are done.
Corollary 1. Polynomials and rational functions are all complex-differentiable whenever they are well-defined.
Theorem 2. If is complex differentiable at
, then it is continuous at
.
Proof. Take the limit of the decomposition
Example 2. The map is differentiable by Corollary 1. Writing
,
Now we note that , which means we can also write
uniquely. Due to
being algebraically rather similar to
, they are fundamentally “portable” from one to another: letting
denote the usual vector space isomorphism from
to
given by
, for any
, define
Denoting and
, it is not hard to verify that
so that we can interpret and
, further emphasising the two-dimensional nature of
, which probes a brief study of multivariable calculus.
Definition 2. Let be a function, and denote the function by
. For any
, define the maps
by
and
. Define the partial derivatives at
by
whenever they exist, and we abbreviate
Example 3. Using Example 2, define and
. To evaluate
, fix
, so that
. Using usual differentiation,
Using partial-derivative notation,
Therefore, when taking , we can regard
as a constant. Similarly,
The connections and
are not coincidental, but an immediate consequence of
being differentiable.
Theorem 3 (Cauchy-Riemann Equations). Given , write
, where
. If
is complex-differentiable at
, then
satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations at
:
Proof. Fix . Since
is complex-differentiable at
, there exists
such that
Writing ,
In the case (corresponding to
),
Similarly, in the case (corresponding to
),
Therefore,
Does this result hold in the reverse direction? To answer this question, we will need to think about multivariable differentiability, and we will explore this topic next time.
—Joel Kindiak, 9 Aug 25, 1820H
Leave a comment