Complex Differentiation

For any z \in \mathbb C, there exist unique real numbers \mathrm{Re}(z) := x, \mathrm{Im}(z):= y \in \mathbb R such that z = x + iy. Recall that \mathbb C forms a normed space under the usual Euclidean norm

\| z \| := \sqrt{\mathrm{Re}(z)^2 + \mathrm{Im}(z)^2}, \quad z \in \mathbb C.

Therefore, we can discuss limits and continuity without worry in the sense of \epsilon\delta limits: f(z) \to f(z_0) if and only if for any \epsilon > 0, there exists \delta > 0 such that

0 < \| w \| < \delta \quad \Rightarrow \quad \| f(z_0+w) - f(z_0) \| < \epsilon.

Differentiation, however, requires more special features of \mathbb C, and it turns out to have even more special features than even \mathbb R^2.

Definition 1. A function f : \mathbb C \to \mathbb C is said to be complex-differentiable at z_0 if there exists a (unique) complex number f'(z_0) such that

\displaystyle \lim_{w \to 0} \frac{f(z_0 + w) - f(z_0)}{w} = f'(z_0).

We say that f is complex-differentiable on K \subseteq \mathbb C if f is complex-differentiable at every z_0 \in K.

Example 0. For any fixed w_0 \in \mathbb C, the constant function f := w_0 is complex-differentiable on \mathbb C with f' = 0: for any z_0 \in \mathbb C,

\displaystyle \lim_{ w \to 0 } \frac{ f(z_0 + w) - f(z_0) }{ w } = \lim_{ w \to 0 } \frac{ w_0 - w_0 }{ w } = 0.

Example 1. The function f := \mathrm{id}_{\mathbb C} : \mathbb C \to \mathbb C (i.e. f(z) = z) is complex-differentiable on \mathbb C, and f' = 1: for any z_0 \in \mathbb C,

\displaystyle \lim_{ w \to 0 } \frac{ f(z_0 + w) - f(z_0) }{ w } = \lim_{ w \to 0 } \frac{ (z_0 + w) - z_0 }{ w } = 1.

Theorem 1. Let f, g : \mathbb C \to \mathbb C be complex-differentiable at z_0 \in \mathbb C.

  • f \pm g is complex-differentiable at z_0,
  • for any \alpha \in \mathbb C, \alpha f is complex-differentiable at z_0,
  • f \cdot g are complex-differentiable at z_0,
  • if g(z_0) \neq 0, then 1/g and f/g are complex-differentiable at z_0.

Proof. Same computations as in the case of real analysis, assuming that the map f : \mathbb C \backslash \{0\} \to \mathbb C defined by f(z) = 1/z is continuous, which we prove below in the special case z_0 = 1 to reiterate:

Fix \epsilon > 0. By algebra,

\displaystyle \left\| \frac{1}{1 + w} - 1 \right\| = \frac{1}{ \| 1 + w \| } \cdot \| w \|.

Therefore, we set \delta := 1/2 so that \| w \| < \delta < 1:

\displaystyle \|1 + w\| \geq | \|1\| - \| w \| | = \|1\| - \| w \| > \|1\| - \delta = \frac{1}{2}.

Plugging in to our original estimate,

\displaystyle \frac 1{\|1 + w\|} \leq 2\quad \Rightarrow \quad \left\| \frac{1}{1 + w} - 1 \right\| = \frac{1}{ \| 1 + w \| } \cdot \| w \| \leq 2 \cdot \|w \|.

Therefore, further stipulate that \delta < \epsilon / 2 (so that consolidating we set \delta := \min\{1, \epsilon\}/4) and we are done.

Corollary 1. Polynomials and rational functions are all complex-differentiable whenever they are well-defined.

Theorem 2. If f is complex differentiable at z_0, then it is continuous at z_0.

Proof. Take the limit w \to 0 of the decomposition

\displaystyle f(z_0 + w) = f(z_0) + \frac{ f(z_0 + w) - f(z_0) }{w} \cdot w.

Example 2. The map f(z) = z^2 is differentiable by Corollary 1. Writing z = x + i y,

f(x + i y) = (x + i  y)^2 = (x^2 - y^2) + i \cdot (2xy).

Now we note that f(z_0) \in \mathbb C, which means we can also write f(z_0) = u_0 + i v_0 uniquely. Due to \mathbb C being algebraically rather similar to \mathbb R^2, they are fundamentally “portable” from one to another: letting \iota denote the usual vector space isomorphism from \mathbb R^2 to \mathbb C given by \iota(x,y) = x+iy, for any f : \mathbb C \to \mathbb C, define

\mathbf f := \iota^{-1} \circ f \circ \iota : \mathbb R^2 \to \mathbb R^2.

Denoting \mathbf f_1 \equiv f_1 := u : \mathbb R^2 \to \mathbb R and \mathbf f_2 \equiv f_2 := v : \mathbb R^2 \to \mathbb R, it is not hard to verify that

f(x+iy) = u(x,y) + i \cdot v(x,y),\quad (x,y) \in \mathbb R^2,

so that we can interpret u = \mathrm{Re} \circ f and v = \mathrm{Im} \circ f, further emphasising the two-dimensional nature of \mathbb C, which probes a brief study of multivariable calculus.

Definition 2. Let u : \mathbb R^2 \to \mathbb R be a function, and denote the function by u(x, y). For any x_0, y_0 \in \mathbb R, define the maps \tilde u (x_0), \tilde u (y_0) by \tilde u (x_0) := u(x_0,\cdot) and \tilde u (y_0) := u(\cdot, y_0). Define the partial derivatives at (x_0, y_0) by

\begin{aligned} \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}(x_0, y_0) &\equiv u_x(x_0,y_0) := (\tilde u (y_0))'(x_0) ,\\ \frac{\partial u}{\partial y}(x_0, y_0) &\equiv u_y(x_0,y_0) := (\tilde u (x_0))'(y_0) \end{aligned}

whenever they exist, and we abbreviate

\displaystyle \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} = u_x \quad \frac{\partial u}{\partial y} = u_y.

Example 3. Using Example 2, define u(x, y) = x^2 - y^2 and v(x, y) = 2xy. To evaluate u_x, fix y_0, so that (\tilde u(y_0))(x) = x^2 - y_0^2. Using usual differentiation,

\displaystyle (\tilde u(y_0))'(x) = \frac{\mathrm d}{\mathrm dx}(x^2 - y_0^2) = 2x.

Using partial-derivative notation,

\displaystyle u_x = \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial}{\partial x} (x^2 - y^2) = 2x.

Therefore, when taking \frac{\partial}{\partial x}, we can regard y as a constant. Similarly,

\displaystyle u_x = 2x = v_y,\quad u_y = \frac{\partial}{\partial y}(x^2 - y^2) = -2y= -v_x.

The connections u_x = v_y and u_v = -v_x are not coincidental, but an immediate consequence of f being differentiable.

Theorem 3 (Cauchy-Riemann Equations). Given f : \mathbb C \to \mathbb C, write f_{\#} = u + i v : \mathbb R^2 \to \mathbb C, where u, v : \mathbb R^2 \to \mathbb R^2. If f is complex-differentiable at z_0 = x_0 + i y_0, then u_x, u_y, v_x, v_y satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations at (x_0, y_0):

\displaystyle u_x(x_0, y_0) = v_y(x_0, y_0),\quad u_y(x_0, y_0) = -v_x(x_0, y_0).

Proof. Fix z_0 = x_0 + i y_0. Since f is complex-differentiable at z_0, there exists f'(z_0) := r_0 + i s_0 \in \mathbb C such that

\displaystyle f'(z_0) = \lim_{w \to 0} \frac{ f(z_0 + w) - f(z_0) }{ w } = f'(z_0).

Writing w = h + i k \in \mathbb R,

\begin{aligned} f'(z_0)&= \lim_{w \to 0} \frac{ f ( (x_0 + h) + i \cdot (y_0 + k)) - f (x_0 + i \cdot y_0) }{ h } \\ &= \lim_{w \to 0} \frac{ u(x_0 + h, y_0 + k) + i v(x_0 + h, y_0 + k) - (u(x_0, y_0) + i v(x_0, y_0)) }{ w } \\ &= \lim_{w \to 0} \frac{ u(x_0 + h, y_0 + k) - u(x_0, y_0) }{ w } + i\cdot \lim_{w \to 0} \frac{ v(x_0 + h, y_0 + k) - v(x_0, y_0) }{ w }. \end{aligned}

In the case k = 0 (corresponding to w = h \in \mathbb R),

\begin{aligned} r_0 + i s_0  &= \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{ u(x_0 + h, y_0) - u(x_0, y_0)  }{ h } + i\cdot \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{   v(x_0 + h, y_0) -  v(x_0, y_0) }{ h } \\ &= (\tilde u(y_0))'(x_0) + i \cdot (\tilde v(y_0))'(x_0) \\ &= u_x(x_0, y_0) + i \cdot v_x(x_0, y_0). \end{aligned}

Similarly, in the case h = 0 (corresponding to w = ik \in \mathbb R[i]),

\begin{aligned} r_0 + i s_0  &= \lim_{ik \to 0} \frac{ u(x_0, y_0+k) - u(x_0, y_0)  }{ ik } + i\cdot \lim_{ik \to 0} \frac{   v(x_0, y_0 + k) -  v(x_0, y_0) }{ ik } \\ &= -i \cdot (\tilde u(x_0))'(y_0) + (\tilde v(x_0))'(y_0) \\ &= v_y(x_0, y_0) - i \cdot u_y(x_0, y_0) . \end{aligned}

Therefore,

u_x(x_0, y_0) = r_0 = v_y(x_0, y_0),\quad u_y(x_0, y_0) = -s_0 = -v_x(x_0, y_0).

Does this result hold in the reverse direction? To answer this question, we will need to think about multivariable differentiability, and we will explore this topic next time.

—Joel Kindiak, 9 Aug 25, 1820H

,

Published by


Leave a comment