Previously, we discussed Taylor series and their cousin Laurent series:
where
The Laurent series exists (and converges uniformly) whenever is holomorphic on
.
Lemma 1. Let be holomorphic on
with Laurent series
If for
, then there exists a unique function
holomorphic on
such that
.
Definition 1. Given the setup in Lemma 1, we call an isolated singularity if
is holomorphic on
for some
. Furthermore, we call
:
- a removable singularity if
for
,
- a pole of order
if
is the largest integer such that
,
- an essential singularity if
for infinitely many
.
A pole of order (resp.
) is called a simple (resp. double) pole.
Denote for brevity.
Lemma 2. An isolated singularity of
is removable if and only if
approaches a limit in
as
.
Proof. In the direction ,
as
. In the direction
, suppose
without loss of generality. Since
has a finite limit at
,
is bounded on some
. Assume
without loss of generality. Hence, we can compute the Laurent coefficients
,
by
For any ,
, By the ML-inequality,
Taking ,
.
Lemma 3. An isolated singularity of
is a pole of order
if and only if
has a limit in
as
.
Proof. In the direction , the Laurent series of
is given by
Multiplying by ,
By Lemma 2, since the right-hand side has a limit as
, so also
.
Lemma 4. An isolated singularity of
is a pole of some order if and only if
as
.
Proof. Suppose for simplicity. In the direction
,
has a Laurent series given by
The Taylor series portion converges to as
. For the other portions, we use the reverse triangle inequality for sufficiently small
to obtain
.
For the reverse implication, suppose as
. First, restrict
such that
. Hence,
is bounded on
. Using the argument in Lemma 2,
is a removable singularity of
. Since
,
as
. Extend
to a holomorphic function
on
, so that
Find the largest such that
, where
is a holomorphic function that has no root in
. Then
Since has no root in
, we can expand it into its Taylor series, so that
In particular, has a pole of order
.
Lemma 5. An isolated singularity of
is an essential singularity if and only if
has no limit in
as
.
Proof. Lemmas 2, 3, and 4.
Essential singularities are therefore relatively bad-behaved points.
Theorem 1 (Casorati-Weierstrass Theorem). Let be an essential singularity of
. Then for any
,
Proof. Assume for simplicity. Suppose for a contradiction there exists
such that the intersection is empty. Then for any
,
. Define
by
, which is bounded above by
, and so has a removable singularity at
. Find the largest integer
such that
for some holomorphic
that does not have a root in
. Therefore,
If , then
is a removable singularity. If
, then
is a pole of order
. Either outcome yields a contradiction.
Having discussed singularities, we are now primed to talk about residues.
—Joel Kindiak, 22 Aug 25, 1458H
Leave a comment