Badly-Behaved Points

Previously, we discussed Taylor series and their cousin Laurent series:

\displaystyle f(z) = \sum_{k=-\infty}^{\infty} c_k (z-z_0)^k,\quad z \in \mathrm{Ann}(z_0, r_1, r_2) ,

where

\displaystyle c_n = \frac 1{2\pi i} \oint_{\partial B(z_0, r)} \frac{f(w)}{(w-z_0)^{n+1}}\, \mathrm dw ,\quad r_1 < r < r_2.

The Laurent series exists (and converges uniformly) whenever f is holomorphic on \overline{\text{Ann}} (z_0, r_1, r_2).

Lemma 1. Let f : \mathbb C \to \mathbb C be holomorphic on \mathrm{Ann}(z_0, r_1, r_2) with Laurent series

\displaystyle f(z) = \sum_{k=-\infty}^{\infty} c_k (z-z_0)^k,\quad z \in \mathrm{Ann}(z_0, r_1, r_2).

If c_k = 0 for k < 0, then there exists a unique function F : \mathbb C \to \mathbb C holomorphic on B(z_0, r_2) such that F|_{\mathrm{Ann}(z_0, r_1, r_2) } = f|_{\mathrm{Ann}(z_0, r_1, r_2) }.

Definition 1. Given the setup in Lemma 1, we call z_0 an isolated singularity if f is holomorphic on \bar B(z_0, r) \backslash \{z_0\} for some r > 0. Furthermore, we call z_0:

  • a removable singularity if c_k = 0 for k < 0,
  • a pole of order m if m is the largest integer such that a_{-m} \neq 0,
  • an essential singularity if c_k \neq 0 for infinitely many k < 0.

A pole of order 1 (resp. 2) is called a simple (resp. double) pole.

Denote \hat{\mathbb C} := \mathbb C \cup \{ \infty \} for brevity.

Lemma 2. An isolated singularity z_0 of f is removable if and only if f approaches a limit in \mathbb C as z \to z_0.

Proof. In the direction (\Rightarrow), f(z) \to c_0 as z \to z_0. In the direction (\Leftarrow), suppose z_0 = 0 without loss of generality. Since f has a finite limit at 0, f is bounded on some B(0, r) \supseteq \bar B(0, r) \backslash \{0\}. Assume |f| \leq 1 without loss of generality. Hence, we can compute the Laurent coefficients c_{-k}, k \in \mathbb N^+ by

\begin{aligned}2 \pi i \cdot c_{-k} &= \oint_{\partial B(0, r)} \frac{f(w)}{w^{-k+1}}\, \mathrm dw \end{aligned}

For any w \in \partial B(0, r), |f(w)/w^{-k+1}| = |f(w)| / |w|^{-k+1} \leq 1 / r^{-k+1}, By the ML-inequality,

\begin{aligned}2\pi \cdot |c_{-k}| = |2 \pi i \cdot c_{-k}| &\leq \frac 1{r^{-k+1}} \cdot 2 \pi r = 2 \pi r^k \quad \Rightarrow \quad |c_{-k}| \leq r^k.\end{aligned}

Taking r \to 0^+, c_{-k} = 0.

Lemma 3. An isolated singularity z_0 of f is a pole of order m if and only if (z-z_0)^m f(z) has a limit in \mathbb C \backslash \{0\} as z \to z_0.

Proof. In the direction (\Rightarrow), the Laurent series of f is given by

\displaystyle f(z) = \sum_{k=-m}^{\infty} c_k (z-z_0)^k,\quad z \in \bar B(z_0, r) \backslash \{z_0\}.

Multiplying by (z-z_0)^m,

\displaystyle (z-z_0)^mf(z) = \sum_{k=-m}^{\infty} c_k (z-z_0)^{m+k} = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} c_{k-m} (z-z_0)^{k}.

By Lemma 2, since the right-hand side has a limit c_{-m} as z \to z_0, so also (z-z_0)^mf(z) \to c_{-m} \neq 0.

Lemma 4. An isolated singularity z_0 of f is a pole of some order if and only if |f(z)| \to \infty as z \to z_0.

Proof. Suppose z_0 = 0 for simplicity. In the direction (\Rightarrow), f has a Laurent series given by

\displaystyle f(z) = \frac{a_{-m}}{z^m} + \sum_{k=1}^{m-1} \frac{a_{-k}}{z^m} \cdot z^{m-k} + \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} a_k z^k.

The Taylor series portion converges to a_0 as z \to 0. For the other portions, we use the reverse triangle inequality for sufficiently small |z| to obtain |f(z)| \to \infty.

For the reverse implication, suppose |f(z)| \to \infty as z \to 0. First, restrict r >0 such that |f| |_{B(0, r) \backslash \{0\}} > 1. Hence, g:=1/f is bounded on B(0, r) \backslash \{0\}. Using the argument in Lemma 2, 0 is a removable singularity of g. Since |f(z)| \to \infty, g(z) \to 0 as z \to 0. Extend g to a holomorphic function G on B(0, r) \backslash \{0\}, so that

\displaystyle G(0) = \lim_{z \to 0} G(z) = \lim_{z \to 0} g(z) = 0.

Find the largest m such that g(z) = z^m \cdot h(z), where h is a holomorphic function that has no root in B(0, r). Then

\displaystyle f(z) = \frac 1{z^m} \cdot \frac 1{h(z)}.

Since 1/h has no root in B(0, r), we can expand it into its Taylor series, so that

\displaystyle f(z) = \frac 1{z^m} \sum_{k=0}^\infty d_k z^k,\quad d_0 \neq 0.

In particular, f has a pole of order m.

Lemma 5. An isolated singularity z_0 of f is an essential singularity if and only if f has no limit in \hat{\mathbb C} as z \to z_0.

Proof. Lemmas 2, 3, and 4.

Essential singularities are therefore relatively bad-behaved points.

Theorem 1 (Casorati-Weierstrass Theorem). Let z_0 be an essential singularity of f. Then for any \delta > 0, w \in \mathbb C, \epsilon > 0,

f(B(z_0, \delta)\backslash \{z_0\}) \cap B(w,\epsilon) \neq \emptyset.

Proof. Assume z_0 = 0 for simplicity. Suppose for a contradiction there exists \delta, w, \epsilon such that the intersection is empty. Then for any z \in B(0, \delta) \backslash \{0\}, |f(z) - w| \geq \epsilon > 0. Define g by g(z) := 1/(f(z) - w), which is bounded above by 1/\epsilon, and so has a removable singularity at 0. Find the largest integer m such that g(z) = z^m \cdot h(z) for some holomorphic h that does not have a root in B(0,\delta). Therefore,

\displaystyle f(z) = w + \frac 1{z^m} \cdot \frac 1{h(z)}.

If m =0, then 0 is a removable singularity. If m > 0, then 0 is a pole of order m. Either outcome yields a contradiction.

Having discussed singularities, we are now primed to talk about residues.

—Joel Kindiak, 22 Aug 25, 1458H

,

Published by


Leave a comment