We explored algebraic topology with the goal of an alternate approach to distinguishing topological spaces, taking heavy advantage of the continuity in the definition of path-homotopy. We can first generalise the idea to homotopy, where we don’t require the paths to have the same start and end points.
Definition 1. Given topological spaces and continuous maps
, a homotopy
from
to
, denoted
, is a continuous map
such that
In the case and that
and
are constant, we call
a path-homotopy.
Lemma 1. forms an equivalence relation on
.
In fact, if is a homeomorphism with inverse map
, then the paths
and
are homotopic to one another. Thus, homotopy-equivalence generalises homeomorphisms as a form of topological invariance.
Lemma 2. Given any continuous map , define the map
by
. Then for any continuous map
,
.
Intuitively, since ,
denotes the collection of loops around a given base point
(that, of course, are path-homotopic to one another). Given continuous maps
such that
, would it follow that
? Unfortunately not, since we don’t get
in general, and thus these two induced maps may not even have the same base points. However if
, then there is a homotopy
between them. Let’s spell out its details for further analysis:
Roughly speaking we should get some kind of connection between them. In fact,
suggesting that if we viewed as a path from
to
, we can get a connection. The key tool of choice is
as discussed in the previous post.
Theorem 1. Given homotopic continuous maps with homotopy
,
.
Proof. We first spell out the goal. Given any loop based on
,
Thus, we need to prove that . Define the path-homotopy
so that
Hence, we can define a loop based on via the straight-line edges
, resulting in a path that looks like
after proper rescaling of the parameters. To prove that this path and are equivalent, for each
, define the path
that is a shrinkage of the original unit square into
.
Intuitively this shrinking continuously approaches as
. Then, define the continuous map
by
.
We leave it to verify that
so that is the desired path-homotopy, as required.
Much of our discussion still rings hollow: we have not computed a single fundamental group! Well, let’s use our tools to evaluate two fundamental groups, a trivial one and a not-so-trivial one.
Example 1. , where
denotes the trivial sub-group in
, and
refers to group isomorphism.
Proof. Fix . Firstly, define the homotopy
from
to
by the straight-line homotopy
for any , since
To prove that , define the path-homotopy
from
to
, since
For our not-so-trivial example , we will need to introduce the idea of path-lifting. Define
, where
is equipped with the usual topology, and the usual exponential map
is defined by
.
Lemma 1. For any connected open set , there exists
such that
and is injective for each
.
Proof. Fix any connected open set . Then
will take either the form
if
or
if
for some
. In the latter case, defining
,
. In general, there exists
such that
Subsequently,
and is injective for each
.
Lemma 2. Let be compact. For any continuous map
with
, there exists a unique continuous map
such that
and
.
Proof. We will use and
to construct
. By the argument in Lemma 1, to obtain
such that
, we can define, roughly speaking, that
. This definition, of course, is nonsense, since
is not injective:
.
Now, since is continuous,
is compact. Thus, we can cover
with a finite open cover
of connected open sets. We obtain the finite open cover
of
, where
. By Lemma 1, for each
, there exists
such that
and is injective for each
. We may assume
without loss of generality.
Hence, we define and paste all continuous pieces together to create
. Furthermore, since
, we define
establishing existence.
The uniqueness follows from the decomposition of into piece-wise bijective segments, then assuming
satisfies
we obtain for each
, so that
.
Lemma 3. If are loops with
and
, then
.
Proof. Let be a path homotopy from
to
:
Since is compact, we use Lemma 2 to obtain a unique map
such that
. In particular,
so that is some fixed integer. Furthermore,
Taking advantage of local injectivity, and likewise
, yielding
as required.
Example 2. .
Proof. Fix any loop with
. Since
, we have
which implies that . By Lemma 3,
whenever
. Hence, the map
is well-defined. We claim that is a group isomorphism. To that end, observe that for each
, defining
,
so that
This establishes as surjective. To establish
as injective, suppose
. Then
so that
is a loop at
.
Since ,
. Hence,
as required. Finally, to establish as an isomorphism, notice that for any
, there exists
such that
Since is injective,
so that
. Hence, if
,
Whew, that was a LOT of hard work! There is a whole lot more to explore about homotopy, but we will not venture there any time soon. For now, let’s use our algebraic topology toolkit to prove several famous results in surprisingly elegant ways. For now, the key takeaways are:
—Joel Kindiak, 16 Jun 25, 1825H
Leave a comment