Previously, we concluded the previous post with a simple question: how do we solve the cubic equation below?
Definition 1. Given real number constants with
, we call the graph
a cubic graph.
Using ideas in undergraduate mathematics, we can show that every cubic graph must have at least one real root.
Lemma 1. Given constants with
, suppose for any
we have
Then .
Proof. To illustrate the proof, observe that setting yields
, so that
For nonzero , we must have
. Since this equation holds for any
except
, using the notion of limits in calculus, we are allowed to set
to deduce
. Repeat the procedure to deduce that
as well.
A more complete proof uses some linear algebra; namely the standard basis of polynomial space.
Now consider the cubic graph . We observe that for any
,
is a uniquely defined real number. Since can write purely in terms of
, we make the notation
, where
We call a polynomial function, properly defined using discrete mathematics. In the case above, we say that
is a cubic function. In fact, the analogous function
is called the quadratic function. The function is called a linear function, since
grows linearly in the following sense:
Similarly the function is called a constant function, since no matter what input number
we plug in, the output is a constant number
.
Lemma 2. For any real number and
,
is a factor of
.
Proof. For the case , we use the difference of squares property:
Thus, is a factor of
. For the case
, we seek constants
such that
On the right-hand side,
In order for the right-hand side to equal , we must stipulate
and
Using these stipulations,
as required.
Theorem 1. For any cubic function, is a factor of
.
Proof. Expanding yields
By Lemma 2, since is a factor of both
and
, there exist polynomials
such that
Since is a polynomial, we have that
is a factor of
.
Remark 1. The result of Theorem 1 still holds for polynomials whose highest power is larger than . Details here.
Lemma 3. Given any linear, quadratic, or cubic function and real number
, there exists a unique polynomial
and a unique real number
such that
We call the remainder of
after dividing by
.
Proof. See Problem 3 in this post.
Theorem 2. Given any linear, quadratic, or cubic function , the remainder of
after dividing by
is
. Furthermore,
is a root of
if and only if
is a factor of
.
Proof. By Theorem 1, is a factor of
. Hence, there exists a polynomial
such that
By Lemma 3, since and
are unique,
is the remainder of
after dividing by
is
. Furthermore,
is a factor of
if and only if
, which holds if and only if
is a root of
.
Remark 2. The first result is called the remainder theorem, while the second result is called the factor theorem. Furthermore, this result holds for polynomials whose highest power of (i.e. degree) is larger than
.
Example 1. Show that the equation has one solution given by
. Hence, solve the equation completely.
Solution. Define the function . We first observe that
Therefore, is a root of
. By the factor theorem,
is a factor of
. Therefore, there exist real numbers
such that
Expanding the right-hand side,
Comparing the coefficients of and
respectively,
and . Therefore,
To solve the equation, we set the left-hand side equal to :
Therefore, or
. In the former,
. In the latter, we use the quadratic equation:
Therefore, or
. Therefore, the equation
has three solutions, namely: .
In particular, we can, somewhat reasonably, solve all cubic equations.
Theorem 3. Given real constants and
, there exists real constants
such that equation
Proof. Define . Using the intermediate value theorem in calculus and real analysis, we can show that
must be a root of
. By the factor theorem,
is a factor of
. Hence, the factorisation holds.
Remark 3. For a more systematic approach to solve cubic equations, i.e. some kind of cubic formula, we need to use complex numbers.
Corollary 1. Every cubic equation has either one real solution, two real solutions, or three real solutions.
Example 2. Determine the (possibly complex) 3rd roots of unity—the solutions to the equation .
Solution. Rather obviously, is a solution of the equation
. By the factor theorem,
is a factor of
. Hence, there exist real constants
such that
Comparing coefficients, , so that
To solve the equation , we use the quadratic formula:
Therefore, .
Remark 4. Defining the primitive cube root of by
, we can show that
This idea is leveraged in the mathematical study called Galois theory, and more broadly, abstract algebra. We call the set a cyclic group under multiplication, and thus Abelian, since
We can establish this connection using some basic divisibility ideas in introductory number theory.
We could experiment with polynomials of higher degrees, but it turns out that we can’t do better than a degree-four polynomial, by an advanced result known as the Abel–Ruffini theorem.
What is for sure is that for any degree- polynomial, we must have
complex roots—this is called the fundamental theorem of algebra. By the intermediate value theorem again, if
is odd, we are guaranteed at least one real root.
All’s to say this: making sense of polynomials with higher powers is really, really hard. We won’t be able to do it much justice in our current discussion, but that’s okay. Let’s start small.
We leave it as an exercise to verify the following algebraic expansions are correct:
How do we expand the binomial ? We explore the answer to this question when discussing the binomial theorem.
—Joel Kindiak, 27 Oct 25, 1214H
Leave a comment