As part of the school curriculum, students are taught the binomial theorem and use solve various meaningless problems. I even asked the following question out of pure curiosity: what is the expansion of ? But why should we even bother with such a question in the first place?
As a pure math student by training, I find no application of the binomial theorem at the secondary school level, except for the proof of one concept: derivatives. Let me use the examples to illustrate.
Among other crucial ideas, one key component in differentiation is to evaluate the expression
If we consider , then leave it as an exercise to verify the following simplifications:
In the differentiation process, we would set on the right-hand side and obtain the expressions
respectively. Continuing the pattern, we would expect that
so that setting , we obtain the expression
. This is better known as the derivative of the function
, but how can we know this information for sure?
It boils down to expanding the expression , how do we do so?
Before we answer this question more completely, we remark that the binomial expansion does get extended to the cases when is not a positive integer in various ways. To achieve that goal, however, would require us to explore some A-Level calculus, and we will delay that task for now.
The content in this post will mirror the discussion in this one, which ties in the binomial expansion with counting problems in probability, but perhaps with less technical terminology.
Firstly, by observation, the highest power of in the expansion
is
. We see this observation play out in the expansions
Therefore, we will suppose that for any , there will be constants
such that
How do we expand ? A power of
denotes multiplying the expression
a total of
times, so that expanding the expression,
Therefore, our expansion of is given by the coefficients
, and for any
,
For the very special case ,
. Comparing coefficients, we set
. We will declare
and
for convenience / convention / simplicity in formulas, so that for
,
, and
as expected.
Lemma 1. For any ,
.
Proof. We have and
. Furthermore,
so that .
Now working on the case ,
Hence,
as expected.
Remark 1. Since the numbers are coefficients of the binomial
, they are unsurprisingly called the binomial coefficients, and often denoted
. It turns out that the formulas that define these numbers generate Pascal’s triangle.
Theorem 1 (Binomial Theorem). For real numbers and any positive integer
,
Furthermore, using ideas in counting problems (i.e. Theorem 4 of this post), for any ,
where for convenience / convention / simplicity.
Proof. The result is trivial if . Suppose
. Setting
, we have
For the general case, we first factorise to reduce to the special case:
We then use the special case to obtain
as required.
Theorem 2. Given , setting
in the right-hand side of
yields .
Proof. Using the binomial theorem,
Setting in the right-hand side yields
A slightly more interesting example arises in the expansion of :
Coupling this calculation with several other high-level convergence ideas, we can derive the definition of . This number is crucial in helping us understand exponential functions when coupled with ideas in calculus.
We touch base with the idea of exponential functions next time. For a fully rigorous construction of these objects, see this post involving real analysis.
—Joel Kindiak, 27 Oct 25, 1827H
Leave a comment