Problem 3. Use Problem 2 to prove Young’s inequality: for any ,
with equality if and only if .
(Click for Solution)
Solution. Setting ,
Furthermore, since , equality holds if and only if
Problem 4. Use Young’s inequality to prove Hölder’s inequality for two-dimensional vectors: given non-negative numbers ,
(Click for Solution)
Solution. If , then implies , and the inequality holds trivially. Without loss of generality, suppose the right-hand side is non-zero. It suffices to prove that
By one application of Young’s inequality,
By a second application of Young’s inequality,
Summing the inequalities,
Problem 5. Use Hölder’s inequality to prove Minkowski’s inequality for two-dimensional vectors: given real numbers ,
(Click for Solution)
Solution. By the vanilla triangle inequality,
By Hölder’s inequality,
so that
Similarly,
Combining the displays,
The result follows by the observation
Remark 1. Denoting
and defining , Hölder’s inequality reduces to
and Minkowski’s inequality reduces to
Setting reduces to the usual Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and triangle inequality for two-dimensional vectors. Furthermore, these results hold for -dimensional vectors, and even “infinite-dimensional” (sufficiently nice) functions.
Question 2. A man of height metres is currently away from a pole of height . He runs in a straight line towards the pole at a speed of . Let denote the angle of elevation from the man to the top of the pole.
Evaluate the rate of change of when the man is at the pole.
(Click for Solution)
Solution. The man’s distance from the pole at time is given by metres. By considering the height difference between the pole and the man,
Let’s properly discuss classical trigonometry. For a novel approach using rational trigonometry, see this post. Assume that the notion of an angle is well-defined.
Definition 1. Consider the following right-angled triangle with acute angle . Here and subsequently, we adopt the radian notation for angles that stipulates .
We abbreviate the words opposite, adjacent, and hypotenuse. We define the sine, cosine, and tangent of as follows:
Example 1. By considering the –– and –– right triangles, we have the following trigonometric ratios for special angles:
The case will play a crucial role for us later. Denote for brevity. We will not care too much about the tangent function, since it is connected to sine and cosine in the following way:
Theorem 1. Let . Then
Proof. For the first identity, use Pythagoras’ theorem to obtain
For the second identity, we observe that
For the last identity, since the complementary angle is ,
Strictly speaking, the cosine function is effectively a mutation of the sine function, and so we could technically do all of trigonometry in terms of sine. However, cosine does have its uses and will play a crucial role in our discussions moving forward.
There are many trigonometric identities built off the first two identities, and we will leave them as exercises in algebraic manipulation. For a serious study of trigonometry, we have to ask the all-important question: what is if is not acute? In particular, what is a sensible definition for ? The answer to the latter question turns out to answer the former question.
Theorem 2. Let be acute angles. If is acute, then
Proof. Consider the following diagram for the proof of both identities.
The first identity corresponds to finding an alternate expression for , and the second identity corresponds to finding an alternate expression for . The ratios of interest are
By considering the area of the whole triangle using the bases and respectively,
The key insight is the following: as long as the right-hand side is well-defined, so is the left-hand side. This is our strategy to define and on all of . Let’s systematise our plan.
Definition 1. For any subset , let be the proposition that for any , and are well-defined, and
Write to abbreviate the proposition “ is true”. Our overarching goal is to provide sensible definitions for and such that . By Theorem 1, we have established and Corollary 1 will help us “double” our results to achieve the massive sub-goal of .
Theorem 3. For any , suppose and are well-defined on . For any , denote and define
If , then .
Proof. Fix . Then . Observe that
so that and
Since , expanding the right-hand side yields
On the other hand,
With careful algebraic expansion, we will obtain
Similarly, we will obtain
Corollary 2.. In particular, we have the following special angles:
Proof. Fix . Then there exists such that . Using induction, we can prove that . Therefore, are well-defined on and the identities
hold for any . Hence, , as required.
Corollary 3. For any ,
Furthermore, for any positive integer ,
We have done a remarkable task: defining on and proving that they satisfy the desired addition formulae. But we haven’t proven this case for all of , since . Surprisingly, though, Corollary 3 gives us a unique insight. Observe that for , and are well-defined expressions. This means we can do a “reverse” definition for non-positive .
Theorem 4. For any , let denote any integer such that . The notions
are well-defined by Corollary 3. Then . In particular,
Proof. Fix . Find such that and . Then so that allows
A similar calculation yields
Thus, we have properly defined and on all of , and even proved that the identities
are well-defined and hold for any . From these two key identities, we obtain all other trigonometric identities commonly obtained in tables of mathematical formulas.
Problem 1. Let be a non-negative function satisfying the following conditions:
is continuous on ,
is differentiable on ,
is strictly increasing on ,
is strictly decreasing on , and
as .
Let denote the rectangle under the curve whose base that intersects the positive -axis has length . If has a minimum prove that is minimised when
where .
(Click for Solution)
Solution. Fix . If , then being strictly decreasing implies , a contradiction. Therefore, . Since as , there exists such that . Use the intermediate value theorem to obtain such that . It is not hard to verify that for . Therefore, the rectangle has an area of .
In fact, more is true. Since is differentiable and strictly decreasing,
Hence, . Differentiating,
Setting yields the desired result.
Problem 2. Suppose further in Problem 1 that is even. Prove that the -value that maximises satisfies the equation
Problem 1. Given functions , define and . Prove that and .
(Click for Solution)
Solution. By definition,
and
Definition 2. A function is odd (resp. even) if there exists an odd (resp. even) integer such that .
Example 1. For any integer , the function defined by is an odd (resp. even) function if and only if is an odd (resp. even) number. Furthermore, is an odd function while is an even function.
Problem 2. For any function and real number , define the function by . In particular, . Prove that is odd (resp. even) if is odd (resp. even).
(Click for Solution)
Solution. We observe that if is odd or even, then , so that
hence .
Problem 3. Prove the following properties:
if are odd, then is odd and is even,
if are even, then is even and is even,
if is odd and is odd (resp. even), then is odd (resp. even) whenever it exists.
if is even, then is even.
(Click for Solution)
Solution. Suppose and , and assume for simplicity. Denote and as per Problem 1. Then
If and are both odd or both even, then is even, so that
Hence, is odd (resp. even) if and only if is odd (resp. even). Similarly,
If and are both odd or both even, then is always even, so that unconditionally, i.e. is even. For the composite function, define . Then
Applying the odd or even condition on ,
If is odd, then is even, so that
Thus, is odd (resp. even) if and only if is odd (resp. even). If is even, then
so that is even.
Problem 4. For any function , prove that there exist a unique odd function and a unique even function such that .
(Click for Solution)
Solution. For existence, define the functions by
It is obvious that . Since ,
so that is odd and is even. For uniqueness, suppose , where is odd and is even. Then , so that is both odd and even. Hence,
Problem 5. Fix , any odd continuous function , and any even continuous function . Prove that