This problem is such an interesting one that, just like a previous problem, was given in an exam, but broken down into more palatable steps.
Problem 1. Prove that there are infinitely many positive even integers such that and .
(Click for Solution)
Solution. Consider , which satisfies the property since and trivially. The core idea is to inductively define in terms of so that both integers satisfy and .
To that end, for any even such that and , define . We claim that and . By definition of , we observe that
Since , find an integer such that . Since the left-hand side is odd, the right-hand side must be odd, so that is odd. Thus,
Consider the function . Since , by the factor theorem, is a factor of . In particular, . Let denote an integer such that
Combining our results,
so that . For the second result,
Since , find an integer such that so that
Since is even, find an integer such that . Then
Since the left-hand side is odd, so is the right-hand side, and in particular, so is . Therefore,
as required. Finally, we have found some infinitely many integers such that and .
When I had to learn economics in high school, I struggled tremendously due to its language-based emphasis (which meant tons of essay-writing with arguably subjective marking schemes).
Yet, I remember how one teaching intern scribbled some equations to prove them mathematically, and those equations were my only takeaways from the entire two years of economics. I’m convinced that economics without equations is gravely incomplete. Equivalently, what this means is that when we include the mathematics with the economic theory, the concepts therein start to illuminate meaning.
Here’s one of my favourite results in economics.
Theorem 1. A firm maximises profit when its marginal revenue (MC) equals its marginal cost (MC) and when the marginal cost is increasing.
Here’s a layperson’s justification for this theorem.
If the firm is producing at a quantity where MR > MC, then it can increase profit by increasing output. The reason is since the marginal revenue exceeds the marginal cost, additional output is adding more to profit than it is taking away. If the firm is producing at a quantity where MC > MR, then it can increase profit by reducing output.
Technically, this explanation can make sense, but I was absolutely confused to pieces by it. Don’t even get me started on having to regurgitate this paragraph compounded with my atrocious handwriting when answering essay-based questions. Let’s define our terms then prove this mathematically.
Definition. Let denote the quantity of a product that a firm produces. Make the following notations:
: the revenue the firm earns by selling units of such a product,
: the cost the firm incurs by producing units of such a product,
: the profit the company earns by selling units of the product.
It is intuitive that . Note that we are adopting economists’ convention to denote profit by , not to be confused with the circle constant.
Equivalently, we define the marginal revenue function and marginal cost function by and respectively.
Now, onto the proof, using the derivative tests that we have previously developed. We will assume that is strictly decreasing, though that actually can be proven from more fundamental principles of economics.
Proof of Theorem 1. To maximise profit at the output level , we need . Since , this implies that
By algebra, . Assuming that is decreasing so that ,
By the second derivative test, is a local maximum for .
We could have many more economics-contextualised applications of differential calculus, but perhaps another time.
Any self-respecting study of differential calculus must include the mean value theorem, which has ubiquitous uses in all of calculus. We will state it here and prove it in two steps: the easier step, followed by the harder step.
Theorem 1 (Mean Value Theorem). Let be continuous, and be differentiable on . Then there exists such that
Proof. We will first prove the special case when , so that . This is known as Rolle’s theorem. Suppose for simplicity that is non-constant.
Without loss of generality, there exists such that . Since is continuous, by the extreme value theorem, there exists such that for any ,
In particular, so that . Since is differentiable at , we will compute its derivative in two steps.
For the first step, by considering -values to the left of , since and ,
For the second step, by considering -values to the right of , since and ,
Since , we have , as desired.
Now that we have established Rolle’s theorem, we prove the mean value theorem. Define the continuous function that is differentiable on by
This helps us ensure that . By Rolle’s theorem, there exists such that . Alternatively, by computing directly,
Setting yields
as required.
The mean value theorem is incredibly useful in calculus, and we will be using it repeatedly as we slowly but surely define rigorously the usual functions that we have been taking for granted.
For now, we evaluate when is differentiable and bijective. We do that the next time.