Let be a commutative ring. Fix a nonempty subset
that is closed under multiplication.
- For any
and
,
and
.
is closed under multiplication.
For instance works. For a concrete example,
works.
Problem 1. Show that the relation on
defined by
In this case, we denote .
(Click for Solution)
Solution. Reflexivity and symmetry are obvious. For transitivity, suppose
Then
so that . Since
, we must have
Problem 2. Show that can be equipped with a ring structure that turns
into a commutative ring with a multiplicative identity, and contains
as a sub-ring. Furthermore, show that if
is an integral domain,
forms a field.
(Click for Solution)
Solution. Intuitively, we would like elements of the form to match the addition and multiplication of rational numbers. Hence, define
both of which can be checked to be well-defined since . It is not hard to check that the ring axioms hold with additive identity
and multiplicative identity
. To justify this claim, we observe that for any
,
Since , we have
, so that
as required.
Furthermore, define the map
for any . We remark that the choice of
does not affect the result since for any
,
Hence, it remains to check that is an injective ring homomorphism, which is not difficult, since
and
and
To justify the last implication, use so that
Since , we must have
, as required.
Finally, suppose is an integral domain. Fix any nonzero
. If
, then
, a contradiction. Therefore,
so that
. Then
, since
as required.
Definition 1. For any integral domain , we call
the fraction field of
.
Example 1. forms a field.
Recall that we have defined elsewhere.
For any ring, define .
Example 2. forms a field.
—Joel Kindiak, 1 Feb 26, 2103H
Leave a comment