Definition 1. Let be a field with at least two elements. Define the characteristic of the field by
where denotes the multiplicative identity in
. If the right-hand side is empty, we set
by convention.
Problem 1. Show that either is prime or
as an isomorphic sub-field.
(Click for Solution)
Solution. Suppose the right-hand side is non-empty. Then there exists some smallest such that
. If
is composite, there exists smaller positive integers
such that
, so that
. Since
is a field, at least one of
is
, so that
, a contradiction. Therefore,
is prime.
Now suppose the right-hand side is empty. Then define the monomorphism by
so that
as a subfield.
Problem 2. Deduce that if for some prime
, then
as an isomorphic sub-field.
(Click for Solution)
Solution. Define the monomorphism by
.
Henceforth, let denote a prime. and suppose
.
Problem 3. Show that for any ,
.
(Click for Solution)
Solution. Using the binomial theorem,
It suffices to check that for
. By computing the binomial coefficient,
Since is prime, none of the numbers in the denominator divides
. Therefore,
, as required.
Problem 4. Show that for some positive integer
.
(Click for Solution)
Solution. By Problem 2, as a subfield. Therefore, there exists
such that
. Let
be a basis for
over
. Then
In particular, .
Problem 5. Show that is cyclic under multiplication.
(Click for Solution)
Solution. Suppose for some prime
and positive integer
. Then
. By the fundamental theorem of arithmetic, there exists primes
and positive integers
such that
By the Sylow theorems, for each , there exists a multiplicative subgroup
of
such that
. By the fundamental theorem of finitely generated Abelian groups, there exists
such that
. In particular,
, so that
Define . Then
Furthermore, for ,
. Therefore,
, so that
.
Problem 6. For any positive integer , construct a unique subfield of
with
elements, denoted
.
(Click for Solution)
Solution. Define . We claim that
forms a field with
elements. Since
does not contain any double root,
. It suffices to check that
forms a field. To that end, given
, we leave it as an exercise in induction to check that for any
,
. Particularising to
respectively,
Therefore, is closed under addition and multiplication, and clearly Abelian in both operations, so that
forms a field, as required.
—Joel Kindiak, 3 May 26, 1852H
Leave a comment